Talk:Bethesda Methodist Chapel, Hanley

Bethesda Methodist Chapel, Hanley has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 4, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bethesda Methodist Chapel, Hanley article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Christianity: Methodism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Bethesda Methodist Chapel, Hanley appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Bethesda Methodist Chapel in Hanley, Staffordshire, now redundant, has been known as the "Cathedral of the Potteries"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/July.

Wikipedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bethesda Methodist Chapel, Stoke-on-Trent/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SilkTork (talk · contribs) 16:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listed. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start reading over the next few days and then begin to make comments. I am normally a slow reviewer - if that is likely to be a problem, please let me know as soon as possible. I tend to directly do copy-editing and minor improvements as I'm reading the article rather than list them here; if there is a lot of copy-editing to be done I may suggest getting a copy-editor (on the basis that a fresh set of eyes is helpful). Anything more significant than minor improvements I will raise here. I see the reviewer's role as collaborative and collegiate, so I welcome discussion regarding interpretation of the criteria. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time}

Tick box[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments on GA criteria[edit]

Pass

Prose is fine. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Article is stable. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Has an appropriate reference section. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Images and captions are fine. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Meets MoS requirements. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:45, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sources checked. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:45, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Follows sources. No OR. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:46, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article is in sufficient depth for the importance of the topic, and would meet most readers requirements for broad coverage. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Query

My only minor query is regarding focus. I question the need to have a section on the Bethesda name. The name seems generic rather than specific to this chapel. The information could be removed at no loss of relevant information regarding the subject, or at the least absorbed more succinctly into the main body. I have already absorbed the generic information regarding the listing into the main body. Anyway, this is a minor query, and it's open to debate, so I won't hold up the GAN on this minor point. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fail

General comments[edit]

There is a disconnect between the article title and the information in the article. Not a GA issue, but I would suggest a move back to its original name of Bethesda Methodist Chapel, Hanley. Most sources refer to the chapel using Hanley rather than Stoke-on-Trent, and Henley is where the chapel is located, as indicated throughout the article. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listing[edit]

This is a useful and information article which meets GA criteria. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]