Talk:Bible Believers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Holocaust denial category[edit]

"Holocaust deniers" are people, not inanimate websites. Find the publishers of the website and prove they are holocaust deniers, but it's not apropriate to categorize the website simply for publishing such content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uncle.bungle (talk • contribs)

Bible Believers is not "google"; the publishers of the website expressly choose which bogus holocaust denial claims anti-Semitism to publicize, and thus can be considered to endorse the hatred. THF 14:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I disagree totally with your statement, thats not the point I'm trying to make. List the publishers, not the website, as it is inanimate. --Uncle Bungle 19:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Statement on behalf of Bible Believers[edit]

Furthermore,

I am the pastor of Bible Believers' Church. We relocated from Sydney a decade ago! Our Church WEbsite contains NO anti-Semitic material other than the about 200MB of the Babylonian Talmud and a plethora of articles by rabbis. The ONLY anti-Semitic group I know of on the face of the earth are the non-Semitic, anti-Semitic self-styled Jews.

The Racial Discrimination Act has nothing to do with any of the many holocausts claimed by Jews:

[lengthy material detailing allegations against jews deleted as not relevant to article. -- fourdee ᛇᚹᛟ 10:58, 18 August 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Bible Believers' Church is PRO-Semitic, PRO-Japhetic, and PRO-Hamitic, as is every Christian on the face of God's earth. I have samples of thirteen years of foolish, unresearched lies published and broadcast about me and my Church by these people over the past thirteen years, in which time we have "turned the other cheek." Their complaint against us is untruthful and the "evidence" systematically mirepresented, neither of the two judges who received it have tested it, and their correspondence is untruthful.

This matter is under appeal in the Federal Court of Australia, Case #261/2007.

This entire entry is scandalous propaganda and should be deleted by Wikipedia.

Yours sincerely in the love and service of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Your brother-in-Christ,

Anthony Grigor-Scott MINISTER OF THE GOSPEL http://www.biblebelievers.org.au —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biblebelievers (talk • contribs)

What? Enigmamsg 07:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted because... The truth is being supressed. --Mere peasant (talk) 07:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Bible Believers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bible Believers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semitic?[edit]

Would it be anti-semitic to mention that according to the Jewish Encyclopaedia (various references between 1901 and 1905, see biblebelievers.org.au/hittites.htm) the great majority of Jews are not semites? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.97.108 (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this article isn't about Kews, and neither the website nor Stinson meet our sourcing criteria at WP:RS. So it doesn't belong here, and without multiple reliable sources making the statement it wouldn't belong anywhere. Doug Weller talk 21:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bible Believers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Believers&oldid=1206287305"