Talk:Breed group (dog)

In General There are Seven

...is misleading. Sure, most have 7 groups, but the names and content vary widely. I still think it needs a table of who has what where, or else just list separately for each org, or else not list the groups at all but refer to the individual KC articles for that info. Elf | Talk 22:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

The most accurate (and the most fair, for show purposes) are the the Fédération Cynologique Internationale's ten groups, each with multiple subgroups (called Sections) that identify basic types and place of breed origin. The strangest group is The Kennel Club (UK)'s Utility Group, a catchall of unrelated breeds. The names of the Groups and which dogs are placed in which Group are just decisions made by kennel clubs. None of these Group categories actually mean anything; research on dog genetics is beginning to show that many categories and breed histories that we thought we knew -- are just old stories. Even the "functional" names of Groups are basically irrelevant when the real function of the vast majority of dogs today is to be a pet.--Hafwyn (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Awkward name

A "breed group" is an entity, and the plural is "breed groups" not breeds groups.

Is there some way to change the name of this article? I think it should be called Breed groups (dogs) or Breed groups (dog) since cats and other animals also have breed groups.----Hafwyn (talk) 23:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Romanian Corb Shepherd

The Romanian Corb Shepherd is NOT internationally recognized by the FCI, but only recognized nationally by the Romanian Kennel Club. Therefore it should be removed from the list of FCI group 2.2(Molossers section). --Canarian (talk) 13:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Breed group (dog). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080824100509/http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/item/435 to http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/item/435
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820121339/http://www.ankc.org.au/home/breeds.asp to http://www.ankc.org.au/home/breeds.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110103093417/http://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/WebPages/LrnBreedInfo to http://www.ukcdogs.com/WebSite.nsf/WebPages/LrnBreedInfo
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051220184740/http://www.canadasguidetodogs.com/breedregistries.htm to http://www.canadasguidetodogs.com/breedregistries.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)