Talk:Camelot Theme Park

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Amusement Parks: UK Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by UK Theme Parks (inactive) (assessed as Top-importance).

What[edit]

What on earth is that blurb above (starting "hi people its wikipedia"). It obviously isn't offical, otherwise it'd have been proofread for spelling mistakes and capitalisation etc--TimothyJacobson (talk) 18:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it. The only other edit to WP by that IP was also to this talk page where he/she removed the "o" from "Low", and broke the WikiProject Amusement Parks|uk=yes|uk-importance=mid template. Both look like "experimenting" or "test edits" to me - I left a note on the IP Talk page -- Begoon (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thought about removing it myself, but have been criticised by other editors in the past for trying to remove un-necessary gumpf (like that) from talkpages--TimothyJacobson (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines does say that "Editing – or even removing – others' comments is sometimes allowed. But you should exercise caution in doing so, and normally stop if there is any objection." and goes on to say "It is still common, and uncontroversial, to simply delete gibberish, rants about the article subject (as opposed to its treatment in the article) and test edits, as well as harmful or prohibited material as described above. Another form of refactoring is to move a thread of entirely personal commentary between two editors to the talk page of the editor who started the off-topic discussion." so I think it's fine on this occasion - although in general I wouldn't edit or remove another Editor's comment on a talk page. Certainly, whatever you do, a note on the other Editor's talk page to explain your action is polite and strongly recommended. Begoon (talk) 23:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up[edit]

I am going to give the page a clean up. At the moment it looks amatuer at best.--TimothyJacobson (talk) 11:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Area[edit]

The infobox states that the park has an area of 40 acres, but this is unreferenced. It was added anonymously[1] and I can't find a reference for this figure. A search finds several sources (all news items) referring to an area of 140 acres, but this may be for the whole site (possibly including the hotel, which is now in separate ownership). Peter E. James (talk) 00:50, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New For 2012[edit]

Corkscrew (Roller Coaster) Shop (a Glimpse With Episodes From Thomas (Seasons 5 - 10 Only and Season 15 - Present) Sooty (Richard Cadell Only) and Backyardigans) (Tractor Tom Items) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.222.79.93 (talk) 18:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Camelot Theme Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]