Talk:Carnatic raga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 27 October 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved with decent support in late comments as proposed (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 03:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Carnatic rāgaCarnatic raga – The article Raga is not spelt with an "ā", and we have to maintain consistency. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose the parent article covers a broader area, in relation to carnatic music the long a is distinguished to help pronunciation in quality English sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:21, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: If that is so, then this should be renamed "Carnatic raaga", based on the pronunciation. Because "ā" is not found on every keyboard. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support WP:USEENGLISH. Raga is not spelt with an ā in English (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/raga). Redtigerxyz Talk 17:44, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Raga is an established term in English, without the ā. That's enough reason for the move on its own, but in addition, standard English phonology gives us the long "a" sound on the first syllable anyway, caused by assimilation to the voiced consonants surrounding it (similarly Mabo). The diacritic is redundant. Andrewa (talk) 11:55, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]