Talk:Chaminade Julienne High School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Victuallers 17:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chaminade-Julienne High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please quit using the Not Newspaper policy as an to excuse to erase the edits[edit]

My edits about a story which came two months ago are good encyclopedic facts not a "a journal of current news," do not "disseminate the opinion of those who write it" and also do not "expose the truth" with an unreliable resource.2601:447:4080:10:59B7:FF01:64E1:419F (talk) 20:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Even Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper only lists breaking stories, news style, news coverage of an individual which doesn't go beyond the context of a single event, and diary as an excuse to erase the edits as well.2601:447:4080:10:59B7:FF01:64E1:419F (talk) 20:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 June 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved DrStrauss talk 10:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Chaminade-Julienne High SchoolChaminade Julienne High School – There is no longer a hyphen between the words Chaminade and Julienne. Evidence of this can be seen on the school's website cjeagles.org and social media pages. The hyphen between the two words was removed several years ago. Keberger (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Dorothy Stang[edit]

User:John from Idegon, would you mind helping me better understand your reverts on including Dorothy Stang? There are many, many sources out there and I provided one such from Notre Dame de Namur. Furthermore, I don't see sources for any of the other alumni. Perhaps I am missing something. Mvblair (talk) 13:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you'll have to excuse me, but I haven't used Wikipedia for a long time. I did not know that I needed to get a consensus for minor edits. I am not up to speed with Wikipedia policies. Let's figure this out together! Mvblair (talk) 13:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mvblair: A media kit is not the best source. Have a look at this book. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, @Magnolia677:. This source seems pretty definitive. Would you suggest editing again using this as the source? Mvblair (talk) 22:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Mvblair: The book is a reliable source. Whenever there is pushback over a source it's always best to seek out a more reliable one. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good advice. Thanks for your help @Magnolia677: