Talk:Cheongshim International Academy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page semiprotection[edit]

To request unprotection, please go to this page and add the request in the appropriate section. If you just want a particular edit to be made, then you can use the {{editprotected}} template on this talk page; instructions on its use are given by following the link. Sam Blacketer 13:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.108.10.9 (talkcontribs)

☒N The template is not accompanied by a specific description of the request. Sandstein (talk) 14:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} The data is outdated, and now, CSIA has six grades in total. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.108.10.111 (talkcontribs)

  •  Not done Please give a source. feydey (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is stated in the article that the class will have 600 people in future (written in 2007), but it's now 2008, and Korea has schools starting from March. It now has 600 people in total.

So release the protection {{editprotected}}

 Not done Please refer to WP:RFP. Happymelon 15:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} The name of vice principal is wrong. Please check http://www.csia.hs.kr, again.

 Not done If you want something changed, please provide the exact text of what you would like changed. The admins can't go to various websites trying to figure out what you want us to change (and most of that website isn't even in English). --CapitalR (talk) 03:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Let's simply delete this article. This article is of no importance.

 Not done I don't think so. WP:AFD if you please. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article assessment comment on Wikiproject Schools[edit]

Argument for article importance better referenced than article. Needs work on referencing, and expansion. Minjokherald (talk) 12:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop redirecting this page to KMLA[edit]

KMLA and CSIA are DIFFERENT schools. Please stop redirecting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.101.9.206 (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Made CSIA an article of its own, though it's just a copy of the former one.User:Walkingturtle (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect issue[edit]

From User talk:121.141.78.9: "CSIA is a new school made by KMLA. It's like a new campus."

With that in mind, this school is large and different enough to warrant it's own article, if it is truly a subcampus in a different location, update the article information to include that with references. Otherwise, stop redirecting the article to the other school or go to WP:RFD and sort it out there. -Falcon8765 (talk) 23:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, CSIA and KMLA are completely separate and different schools. Not sure how to find a reliable source for this though. How many sources bother saying that two schools are different? For example, would a newspaper waste space telling it's readers that Harvard and Princeton are different schools? Curtis95112 (talk) 05:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. I am hoping to go to CSIA by next year, and I have never heard of KMLA until I looked up CSIA on Wikipedia. Also, CSIA and KMLA are very different. CSIA is a middle school as well as a high school. Why does CSIA happen to redirect to a page that has nothing to do with it? And, yes, it wouldn,t say anything about the difference between two completely different schools in a newspaper, but I'm sure that the CSIA website might help (http://www.csia.hs.kr)... Infocraze (talk) 14:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment November 2013[edit]

Significant improvement since last assessment so giving a C class rating. Would benefit from information about the curriculum. As always, refer to Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines for tips to improve the article further. Hope that proves helpful. Good luck! Duffit5 (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 February 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No support for the proposal. Number 57 13:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Cheongshim International AcademyCheongShim International Academy – The target is the WP:COMMONNAME of the subject. The page has been moved per WP:NCCAPS, which does not apply as the subject falls under the exception as a Proper Name. --Relisted. Number 57 14:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC) KJ Discuss? 07:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • How aBout some seConDaRy sourCes to supPort the proPosed move? WiKiPeDiA's style esChews caMelCase unLess wideLy used (MOS:TMRULES). —  AjaxSmack  01:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. News article searches of Korean newspapers (for their English editions) show that CheongShim is the most widely used name, as shown in this Korean Herald article, this Korea Times article, as well as this one, along with this Korean Daily article. Cheongshim is used, but rarely (for instance, here). KJ Discuss? 03:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sawol Could you refer me to the policy or guideline that you're alluding to? Thanks. KJ Discuss? 03:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: According to my search results of English-language Korean newspapers, Cheongshim is more common. Examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Random86 (talk) 08:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheongshim International Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Cheongshim International Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]