Talk:Classical and Quantum Gravity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Corrected the wrong link to Will's institute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.226.79.90 (talk) 09:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Journal abbreviation[edit]

I think the journal abbreviation "Classical Quant. Grav." is not correct. According to the LTWA classic- is abbreviated Class. while quant. would be the abbreviation for quantitative and quantum is unabbreviated. So the correct abbreviation would be "Class. Quantum Grav." which is also the abbreviation used by the journal itself. Xaggi (talk) 10:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The overwhelming majority of citations (~ 600K to 7K ) support your position. JohndanR (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that would be (~ 6K to 7K), although I don't recall my search; 600K sounds anomalously high. JohndanR (talk) 02:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The ISO abbreviation is Class. Quantum Gravity, and that's what's in the infobox. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]