This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
I think the journal abbreviation "Classical Quant. Grav." is not correct. According to the LTWA classic- is abbreviated Class. while quant. would be the abbreviation for quantitative and quantum is unabbreviated. So the correct abbreviation would be "Class. Quantum Grav." which is also the abbreviation used by the journal itself. Xaggi (talk) 10:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The overwhelming majority of citations (~ 600K to 7K ) support your position. JohndanR (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that would be (~ 6K to 7K), although I don't recall my search; 600K sounds anomalously high. JohndanR (talk) 02:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The ISO abbreviation is Class. Quantum Gravity, and that's what's in the infobox. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]