Talk:Columbia Bible College

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

This article reads as an Advertisement it should remain as noted such until it is updated Nathanbrisk (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The accusation that this article reads like an advertisement is ridiculous. I have looked at other articles dealing with educational institutions in British Columbia and most of them present the same information as this article does. All of the information presented in this article is factual and describes the college's history and current situation. What in Nathanbrisk's opinion is the difference between the way the current article is written and the way it should be written? Should the article only deal with history and not current programs? Numerous other articles dealing with educational institutions deal with current programs. Does that make them "advertisements" as well? Furthermore, who is Nathanbrisk and why is he or she so concerned about this particular article? Rdthiessen (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a couple of areas where the article reads as an advertisement:

A state of the art Athletics Centre was built in 2001. It is home to the newly named "Bearcats". It features 2 full size courts and seating for 1200, Fitness Centre, Athletic Therapy Room, Team Room, Classroom and more.

to serve the students better by featuring a state of the art kitchen and dining room

. . . as well as the section on the programs offered. Also, sections regarding the growth of the campus also are advertisement-like. This article should stand on its own and be written in an objective manner. I do not know who can complete this job, but the current writing (in parts) is unacceptable. Nathanbrisk (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 21:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Columbia Bible College (British Columbia)Columbia Bible College – It seems strange to have the base title redirect to an institution (Columbia International University) that last had this name 20 years ago. Looking over "Columbia Bible College" -wikipedia, most uses refer to the Canadian college. By all means, let's have a hatnote, but it should go the other way. BDD (talk) 23:35, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agree - Correct and it would require a hatnote. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:00, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Thsi one seems very straightforward.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼ 
  • Support Superfluous disambiguation. Hatnotes are too often forgotten about. walk victor falk talk 15:49, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Columbia Bible College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]