Talk:Culture in music cognition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCulture in music cognition was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 16, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 4, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the music a person hears in childhood may affect that person's musical cognition as an adult?

DYK submission[edit]

wikify[edit]

I've placed a wikify tag. The article is overlinked and many common terms should be delinked. See WP:OVERLINK. Dozens of links point to disambiguation pages and these should links (if indeed they should stay in the first place) need to be disambiguated. There may also be some repeatlinks, but from my quick look, that appears to be much less of a problem than the first two issues. See WP:REPEATLINK. Schwede66 07:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've removed a lot of the overlinking from this article, removed repeat links, and disambiguated the links. I think it's good enough to remove the tag now. Do you agree? —Waterlily16 (talk) 02:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've removed the tag. Sorry, I wasn't watching the article; I'm only watching the DYK nomination (transcluded above). Schwede66 17:24, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Culture in music cognition/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sasata (talk · contribs) 23:33, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll claim this review. I'll make uncontroversial copyedits as I read the article, and bring anything else here for discussion. Comments in a day or two. Sasata (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments. Ok, here's some comments to get us started. Prose looks good, but there's a few instances where psycho-jargon is used without adequate explanation. Some end-of-paragraph sentences are uncited, leaving me to question whether the conclusion if from a source or from the authors of this article. I'll let you work on these while I dig more deeply into the literature and cross-check some of the sources. Sasata (talk) 20:24, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Familiarity for culturally regular meter styles" what is a regular meter style?
  • "The looking times of 4- to 8-month old Western infants indicate …" what is a "looking time"?
  • "… and did not indicate that one style of music was more tense than the other." not sure what this means
  • "… the children's self-reported distraction was the same for all excerpts." there is no context or explanation given that helps me understand what this "distraction" is about
  • "Thus, the language of lyrics interacts with a listener's culture and language abilities to affect preferences." is this a conclusion from the source? If so, it should be cited (if not, it's original research)
  • "Fast tempo, for example, is typically associated with happiness, regardless of a listener's cultural background." source? (Anecdotally, when I listen to thrash metal, I don't associate that with "happiness")
  • "Thus, the cue-redundancy model may be overly simplistic in its distinctions between structural feature detection and cultural learning, at least in the case of complexity." source?
  • "Use of dichotomous scales (e.g., simple happy/sad ratings) may mask this phenomenon, as these tasks require participants to report a single component of a multidimensional affective experience." source?
  • please explain/link/define "executive function, "semantic retrieval", "cognitive schemata"
  • enculturation should be linked earlier is the article (there's some other examples of terms that should be linked earlier, on their first occurrence--tempo comes to mind; please check throughout)
  • links already present in the article are not to be repeated in the "See also" section

No response from nominator, who has been inactive for a couple of weeks, so I am failing this review. Sasata (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Technical comment): the bullet list above was added in the 24 November edit, not in the 13 December fail. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 21:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Davidson edits (2012)[edit]

Student will be adding new references. Greta Munger (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will be adding twenty research articles worth of information concerning musical preferences as a function of personality. Lindy.williams —Preceding undated comment added 23:40, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Davidson College supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Davidson College supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by Primefac (talk) on 16:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]