Talk:Dasmesh Public School, Faridkot

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dasmesh Public School, Faridkot article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Punjab Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Schools Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

March 2021 source tag[edit]

No 2 better sources than the horse's mouth. Puraana Bhoot (talk) 10:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Horse's mouth? Pahunkat Alternate Account (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A "primary reliable source" it is meaning. Puraana Bhoot (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per your own admission this is a primary source - we need multiple secondary reliable sources - SEE wp:nschool. Pahunkat (talk) 17:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not my admission but the source itself. Secondary cannot be reliable because it is open to all sorts of misinterpretations and also personal POVs of the reporter. Blogs for example are secondary. Graffiti on the walls is secondary. I cannot allow your rationalisation, sorry. Puraana Bhoot (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]