Talk:David Heymann (architect)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA Sweeps reassessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of July 19, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

Notified: User:Johntex, User:Scm83x, User:AnonEMouse, User:Salmonella Tomato, WP:WikiProject Biography, WP:WikiProject Architecture, WP:WikiProject Texas, WP:WikiProject University of Texas at Austin

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   b (MoS):

   • The sections are unbalanced - what else has been designed by him apart from the WWH for George W? Personal life is very sparse. How about early life, what is he doing now? Jezhotwells (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • Ref #8 [1]] is a dead link; Ref #11 [2] is a dead link; The EL [3] is a dead link; ref #10 should found at the original source, the Chigago Tribune; ref #15 should be sourced to the original Austin American-Statesman. All other sources OK. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • All sources appear Ok, but the newspaper artciles should be the originals not copies on other websites. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   • Too focussed on one building

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • OK, I will delist this as no progress has been made in seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)