Talk:Electronic visual display

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article provides a well-funded comprehensive classification of the field of electronic visual displays which is a complex field of technoloy.

Which is the reason this article should be "cleaned up" ???

panjasan (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)panjasan[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Electronic visual display. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060523001732/http://www.sipix.com/technology/epaper.html to http://www.sipix.com/technology/epaper.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100315092211/http://www.ntera.com/ to http://www.ntera.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Visual display unit" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Visual display unit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 8#Visual display unit until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible merge candidate (cross-posted here)[edit]

See flat-panel display, which I just cross-linked in the lead of both articles.

I'm going to propose this myself, since I'm a tumbleweed. It's far from clear how these two article intend to be dissected, if they remain distinct. Either clarity on this issue, or elimination of the duplication is a desired outcome. — MaxEnt 01:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]