Talk:Enhanced driver's license

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enhanced Drivers License. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EDL vs. REAL ID[edit]

I am working on what will likely be multiple edits to differentiate EDLs from REAL ID-compliant licenses. EDL and REAL ID are *NOT* the same thing, even if states sometimes confuse the two. For example, the Arkansas DMV calls its REAL ID-compliant licenses "Voluntary Enhanced Security Driver's Licenses", yet specifically says they do not work at border crossings like EDLs do.[1] (In fact, Arkansas Code Section 27-16-1206(b) specifically prohibits RFID chips in all Arkansas driver's licenses, a mandatory requirement for EDLs.[2]) On the other hand, Minnesota issues EDLs, and they are still acceptable for REAL ID purposes; but as of today that state is considered non-compliant with REAL ID[3], though I understand it recently passed REAL ID legislation. Please do *NOT* add REAL ID-compliant states to this article unless they *ALSO* issue EDLs; I understand the only state that currently issues both is Vermont. --RBBrittain (talk) 02:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You should read DHS's website for Maryland. Maryland's license is valid at border crossings. I have one.
They state
REAL ID Enforcement: Maryland
COMPLIANT
Maryland is compliant with the REAL ID Act. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylerk (talkcontribs) 15:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And that's fine and dandy, except for the fact that this page is about EDLs, which are a completely different beast from Real ID compliant IDs. A Maryland DL will NOT work at a border crossing. (I also have the new MD DL.) — tooki (talk) 16:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious statement about REAL ID compliance[edit]

The article contains the following statement: "However, a U.S. state that issues only EDLs, but does not issue any other REAL ID-compliant driver's license, is not deemed compliant with the REAL ID Act unless granted an extension."

However, a counterexample to this statement is Washington state, which issues EDLs/EIDs, and does not issue any other REAL ID-compliant driver's license/ID (though it does issue non-REAL-ID, non-enhanced driver's licenses/IDs). But all states (including Washington state) are listed as being REAL ID compliant without extension (green) in the map here.

This statement does contain a citation, which links to this page, section "State Compliance". I believe the citation is referring to this question: "Q. If my state issues an Enhanced Driver’s Licenses, is that sufficient for my state to be REAL ID compliant?", to which the answer includes, "However the existence of an EDL is not sufficient to consider the state to be in overall compliance for purpose of determining whether a federal agency may accept a state’s regular driver’s license for official purposes." But "is not sufficient to consider the state to be in compliance" is very different from "is not deemed compliant". --209.0.128.237 (talk) 22:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That FAQ currently states "DHS is working closely with all states and territories to provide assistance and guidance to achieve full compliance by the May 7, 2025 deadline. As of March 26, 2021, 55 states and territories are fully compliant with the REAL ID requirements, and all states are on track to begin issuing compliant licenses and IDs by the May 7, 2025 deadline." I have updated the main page accordingly. ckd (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]