Talk:F-ratio (oceanography)

Ecology Mid‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Oceans Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : List of oceanographers, create a comprehensive article on Concentrations of marine debris out of all the gyre and "garbage patch" articles
Copyedit : Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Expand : Coral Sea, Endeavour Strait, Greenland Sea, Solomon Sea
Photo : find images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the oceans
Stubs : Oceanography stub articles, Marine geography stub articles, Aleutian Trench, Bellingshausen Sea, Caernarfon Bay, Gerlache Strait, Gulf of Oman, Iceland Sea, Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Update : Botany Bay, Wilkins Sound, Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep
Verify : Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Bering Sea, Gulf of Aden, Iceberg B-15, Ionian Sea, Japan Trench, Moreton Bay, Sound (geography), Timor Sea
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia

Limnology and Oceanography Mid‑importance

	Oceans portal This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 23 August 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from F-ratio to F-ratio (oceanography). The result of the discussion was moved.

Disambiguation[edit]

This article should be disambiguated. F-ratio in optics can also mean the ratio of the focal length of a telescope to its aperture. And there's also an F-ratio distribution in statistics. Jason Quinn 17:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Do you want to write the page, or shall I? I started this one but only found out about the other f-ratios later. I don't think they have pages yet - I certainly couldn't find any. Cheers, --Plumbago 17:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you? I'm not that good with Wikipedia yet. I'm still learning the ropes (and I don't have the time right now anyway). Thanks. Jason Quinn 17:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. All you do is add a {{otheruses}} link to the original page; this creates a link on that page to a disambiguation page; you then edit this to point to the other definitions. Have a look at the page here and its disambiguation link. Cheers, --Plumbago 08:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biological significance[edit]

This was a very nice job. I added a little bit of text describing the distinction between the export and microbial loops and referencing the papers of Laws et al. (2000) and Dunne et al. (2005). --Agnana 20:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sediment traps[edit]

Dear authors of this page. Congratulations for your efforts. I suggest to add something to the 'overview' section. Beyond the logistic problems involved in deploying sediment traps (as the texts explains), sediment traps are known to experience a number of bias: currents may affect the efficiency of the collection process; zooplantkon may enter actively the traps biasing the measurment of the gravitative flux; .. many things may happen. And even if you are able to limit the biases and believe that the trap is measuring relaibly the settling flux of particles, then still you have to consider that such a flux is not strictly vertical but three-dimensional. Sediment traps are at present the best available tools to estimate the downward flux of organic matter derived from photsynthesis in the upper ocean...but they present still many drawbacks. If you need references try for example:

Thomas, S., and P.V.Ridd (2004). Review of methods to measure short time scale sediment accumulation. Marine Geology. 207, 95-114.
Buesseler, K.O.; et al. (2007). "An assessment of the use of sediment traps for estimating upper ocean particle fluxes". J. Mar. Res. 65: 345–416. ISSN 0022-2402. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jmr/jmr/2007/00000065/00000003/art00002.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.5.131.43 (talk) 12:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I'll try to add the references that you suggest. Cheers, --PLUMBAGO 08:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great job, specialists[edit]

Wikipedia has done it again. You've explained the f-ratio to each other elegantly. Now, what is the f-ratio? JohndanR (talk) 18:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is something of a fair point (and largely my fault in this article), though it would be useful if you could point to particular deficiencies. That'll help editors make it clearer to the general reader. Thanks for dropping by! Cheers, --PLUMBAGO 11:21, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:F-ratio (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]