Talk:Fellowship of Independent Evangelical Churches (Australia)

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Fellowship of Independent Evangelical Churches (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

@StAnselm: StAnselm You undid the section on complementarianism on the FIEC page because you thought it gave this doctrine undue weight. The point of making a separate section was that the FIEC itself has recently given complementarianism "undue weight" in its statement of belief, making it a prominent instead of secondary doctrine. I would like to include their particular statement about only men being preachers and elders in the church as part of this article. I don't think it can be assumed that readers would know that complementarian means this as there are a few different gradations of it, with "soft" complementarians allowing women to teach sometimes in certain circumstances. Can you agree that I insert part of the church statement of belief back into the article but without a separate section, just a clarifying extra sentence or two? LPascal (talk) 11:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's what it has now: a link to complementarianism with a sentence to explain/clarify. Now, closely related to the issue of undue weight was that you had no third-party/independent sources. Who's to say that these views are a big deal? Why are you focusing on this rather than all the other things in the membership booklet? Can you find reliable third-party sources describing FIEC's complementarianism? St Anselm (talk) 14:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]