Talk:Force 136

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National uprising in Burma[edit]

Did Force 136 actually "coordinate" the various revolts and uprisings in Burma in 1945 ? My reading, from various sources, suggest that the Karens came out into open revolt at a moment determined by General William Slim, commanding British Fourteenth Army, when it would best coincide with his army's operations and plans. The Burma National Army on the other hand, chose its own moment to change sides and declare openly for the Allies.

In neither case does Force 136 seem to have been the overall controlling authority; they either transmitted Slim's orders or could merely observe events without being able to dictate them.

HLGallon 23:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

other...[edit]

"There were also American reservations over restoring the French colonial regime after the war" yes (that's why they supported the viet minh as soon as 1945) but the british were also colonials and therefore supported the french! obvious pov in the current article Cliché Online (talk) 18:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you like it or not, the French were the de facto legitimate government in French Indo-China/Vietnam prior to the Japanese occupation, and it was none of Britain's business to meddle in the political affairs viz., who ran the country after the expulsion of the Japanese. Neither for that matter was it any of the US's business either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.11.183 (talk) 11:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The restoration of legitimate pre-war governments was one of the requirements and war aims of the Atlantic Charter which Roosevelt had also signed, in addition to Churchill.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Force 136. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Syntax[edit]

Article has many ungrammatical usages but reads well. Needs an editor to correct these minor flaws. Spyglasses (talk) 22:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]