Talk:Forefather (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This page reads like a promotional release. Needs to be fixed.

In fact, I was looking at their webpage and it turns out that their official biography was just copied and pasted onto Wikipedia.

  • Should they really be called a band with only two members? Surely "duo" would be more suitable? Prophaniti 15:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Updates/References[edit]

I'm going to update this page as soon as I can. Within 48 hours. New ref's and everything. Willknowsalmosteverything (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added a couple. I may well come back and do more. Willknowsalmosteverything (talk) 16:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks for that. However, with your link to the Seven Kingdoms records, you linked to Forefather's article. For future reference, an article should never be linked to itself. Also, while the addition of references is appreciable, it's recommended that the reference format have more than just bare URLs. Peace and happy editing. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 21:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Updates/references...finally[edit]

Just made good on my promise...two years later. No longer does the page 'read[] like a promotional release' / contain text from their official biography. Willknowsalmosteverything (talk) 19:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 April 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 19:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


ForefatherForefather (band) – After being moved, Forefather should be retargeted to Ancestor (same target as Forefathers). 176.42.16.148 (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support the band has 171 views but Ancestor has 2,984[[1]] and Google suggests the generic term is primary even from England and would at least be primary by long-term significance. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, obvious really. Hyperbolick (talk) 09:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per common name and above comments. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.