Talk:Four-phase logic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re the notice for speedy deletion, I am the writer of the web page mentioned (http://www.rwilson.org.uk/ic_memories/four_phase.htm) and I'm also the author of this new Wikipedia article - it's the same material but slightly edited to give a less personal view.

I personally think this topic is notable enough for Wikipedia, but the article seems like it's written as an essay, rather than in encyclopedic tone. I recommend altering the article to have sections and to put some more third-party sources in. Useight 18:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this article should be deleted, but for different reasons. This article reference PMOS and/or NMOS logic which has not been manufactured for over 30 years. Most chips today use CMOS logic and typically do not use this form of clock circuit. This article is either obsolete or due for an extreme makeover. --71.245.164.83 (talk) 01:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, let's delete everything older than 25 years... -- idiot.83.255.39.183 (talk) 16:08, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Four-phase logic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]