Talk:Francis James (missionary)

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: China Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Christianity in China work group (assessed as Low-importance).

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I would not support the deletion of this entry (although I am not the author or contributor).

I am uncertain of the exact reason for consideration but from what I can tell it may be either:

No source - existance not confirmed Tricky to know how I can 'prove' this other than to say the Richard Bellamy named in this entry was my great grandfather and Francis' death in China was and remains known in our family. I also have documentary proof of the notification of his death so I can confirm (for what it's worth) that he did exist and the family record supports the detail within the page

Introduction too narrow Whilst accepting that the introduction could be improved, it isn't sufficiently vague to justify deletion on this basis alone. His area of contribution was fairly narrow but he was one of the pathfinders in this period of China's history with the west.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.127.178.133 (talk • contribs)

The article now is fine, but in the moment I marked it was very bad. Now is really better.

Willy Weazley 15:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a genealogical website[edit]

I have kept the basic information about his two sons, but have removed excessive details about their marriages and careers. That is just unencyclopedic and excessive genealogical information which would likely be of interest only to descendants or relatives, and not to the general reader of an encyclopedia. Sites such as Ancestry.com , MyFamily.com, and RootsWeb welcome lengthy family genealogical accounts, with details of every birth, death, marriage and career. See WP:UNDUE. Putting in all details of a son's career is undue weight. If a son is notable by our standards such as WP:BIO or one of its sub-guidelines, then create his own article, but do not use the article on a notable missionary as a hook on which to hang the life details of the descendant. Edison (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis James (missionary). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120403061113/http://lib.stanford.edu/east-asia-library/chinese-books-display-textbooks-end-19th-and-early-20-century-china to http://lib.stanford.edu/east-asia-library/chinese-books-display-textbooks-end-19th-and-early-20-century-china

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]