Talk:Francis Kallarakal

Honorific titles

The honorific titles I removed and you restored are in clear violation of MOS:HONORIFIC. Please say why you have restored them. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC) PS: MOS:HONORIFIC says, in pertinent part, "Styles and honorifics related to clergy and royalty, including but not limited to His Holiness and Her Majesty, should not be included in front of the name, but may be discussed in the article." Though other style guides may suggest a different usage for general or public use, Wikipedia determines the style to be used in its articles. — TransporterMan (TALK) 19:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Apologies. Could you please assist me in positioning honorific titles in the mentioned page or clean up. Thanks 03:22, 3 September 2011 (HKT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jean.julius (talk • contribs)

Per MOS:HONORIFIC it's not so much a question of positioning them as it is avoiding their use, except to describe them if appropriate in the text of the article. Titles which "come with the position," such as Most Reverend in this case ordinarily should not be mentioned at all (except, as you've done, in the infobox title since it specifically calls for them). Academic titles can be described in the text by saying that "Jones received a doctor of philosophy (PhD) degree in 2007 from Biskupin University". From this article, it's not clear where Kallarkal received his "Dr." so I can't help you formulate it exactly. Unfortunately, in looking for that information, I've just spotted a much more serious problem: copyright and will be forced to tag the article for deletion because of it. — TransporterMan (TALK) 21:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Most. Rev. Dr. Francis Kallarackal.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Most. Rev. Dr. Francis Kallarackal.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis Kallarakal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110903084030/http://www.cbcisite.com/Photographs.htm to http://www.cbcisite.com/Photographs.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 5 October 2017 (UTC)