Talk:Go!Zilla

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2008. The result of the discussion was delete but userfy.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Rewrite[edit]

Wikipedia is not a review site. This article is completely POV and has barely been improved since its 2004 inception. I don't think theres anything worth reusing, as it's all opinion. I recommend either a rewrite or deletion on notability grounds (doesnt seem particularly popular judging by the number of edits) --jeffthejiff 23:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is that it was one of the most popular pieces of software pushed by ZDTV, and rightly so. It was probably the best download manager back in the day. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.25.182.109 (talk)

Rewritten[edit]

It was userfied to me and I re-wrote it with sources, this is not G4 eligible as it's significantly different. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 12:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Go!Zilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227015227/http://www.giac.org:80/certified_professionals/practicals/gsec/3744.php to http://www.giac.org/certified_professionals/practicals/gsec/3744.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]