Talk:Green Naugahyde

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled discussion[edit]

Changed the track times to reflect their actual times from the leak that surfaced today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.39.164.0 (talk) 22:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's Jilly's On Smack, not "chili's". the person that keeps changing that back clearly doesn't know what he's talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.93.28.171 (talkcontribs) 14:35, 2 June 2011

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true. Right now, we have two conflicting sources that are both roughly equal. If you have a definitive source that trumps them both, link to it here and someone will update the article. --Monkeynutbar (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's listed as Jilly's in this rolling stone article released yesterday. I think the debate is official over, It's Jilly's. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/les-claypool-return-of-drummer-jay-lane-has-breathed-life-back-into-primus-20110610 — Preceding unsigned comment added by GhostwheelProductions (talkcontribs) 13:57, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Primus website announced that it's going to be released September 2011. http://www.primusville.com/

We've also got an article that gives a release date of September 13th right here: http://theaudioperv.com/2011/06/06/primus-set-to-release-green-naugahyde-on-september-13/ --69.136.96.78 (talk) 18:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Bobo arachnid, 7 June 2011[edit]

Please change the release date from July 2011, to September 13, 2011 because it was announced via the Primus website on June 5th, 2011.

Bobo arachnid (talk) 15:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Green Naugahyde is the upcoming seventh studio album by funk metal group Primus, currently slated for release in July 2011." needs to be changed too. --69.136.96.78 (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --Monkeynutbar (talk) 07:46, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genres[edit]

Isn't it a little early to list genres? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.234.180 (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Objectivity[edit]

The critics are only good, it's all good, this album is good, it is so good, is it what really Wiki stands for ? What about a little bit of objectivity ? I'm pretty sure some reviews stated that Primus is doing some Claypool's project or that the lyrics really suck... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.100.42.50 (talk) 18:41, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added literally every professional review I could find at the time of release (note: professional review). There are a couple of negative reviews in there, but as stated, they're "generally positive, if somewhat mixed". Considering that we can only take a few sentences from each review so as not to infringe on copyright, I tried to keep things fair by balancing each negative quote with a positive, so as not to mis-represent a mixed review as a negative one. Having said that, most of the reviews are positive, so I couldn't always find a negative quote to balance them out.
I didn't find any reviewers describe it as "Claypool's project", or mention that "the lyrics really suck", but you can read through the refs. If you think I've used the wrong quotes, making them seem more positive than they are, then feel free to change them. Likewise, if you can find any other professional reviews, maybe some more negative ones, feel free to add them to balance out the positive ones. WP:BOLD -- Monkeynutbar (talk) 01:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Green Naugahyde. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Green Naugahyde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Green Naugahyde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]