Talk:Haugesund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famous people section[edit]

I don't think Sildakongen is worth listing as a famous person. The man is hardly famous beyond county borders. Locally, he is more known as an eccentric than an "entertainer"; or "master mariner", as his profession as master mariner does not make him worthy of this list; and the title of "herring king" is both ridiculous and confusing for pretty much everyone except the population of Haugesund. The title of a joke more than anything, and does not suit the tone of a serious Wikipedia article. --80.202.176.15 (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but I have removed the whole list as original research since there were no clear inclusion critera. Listing "Famous" people is a highly subjective exercise that has no room in an encyclopedia. Rettetast (talk) 14:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Haugesund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Haugesund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Haugesund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal: Merge Haugesund (town) back to the main article here[edit]

A separate article on the main settlement of Haugesund muncipality, Haugesund (town) was created in June 2020, with most of the content added in October.

I am unconvinced that a separate article on the town of Haugesund vs. the municipality of Haugesund is needed. The "town" of Haugesund is a designated built-up area ("tettsted") used by the Norwegian Statistics bureau for some statistical tabulations. However, the town itself has no separate local government or official identity. I see no reason why the town and municipality cannot be covered in the same article. As the article stands, this page looks like a content fork. Indeed, much of the content in this article was copied straight from the article on the municipality Haugesund. Such articles have some undesirable effects since information about the location, the history, and the infrastructure ends up duplicated in the two articles, making it more tedious to maintain two articles rather than one article. Readers are forced to click to get to the second article.

I therefore propose merging the two articles together again. Sjakkalle (Check!) 20:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]