Talk:Hell–Sunnan Line

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hell–Sunnan Line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 02:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I'm at a loss as to what is the purpose of the right column of numbers in {{Hell–Sunnan Line}}.

   That is the elevation. I've added a legend entry to help guide the reader.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Is the Norwegian Railway Club a WP:RS? I haven't read anything to lead me to believe it's not. Also, one links to Norsk Jernbaneklubb, which redirects, but shouldn't they be similar?

   Fixed so it is consistent. Not everything on NJK's website is reliable, but that particular database is, along with their published books and quarterly magazine. The station database has been made by the club's research division, is largely based on Thor Bjerke's Banedata (he is a museum curator) and is edited by Svein Sando, who has written many railway history books. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Nice work. I'm going to place it on hold for long enough to get an explanation if the railway club is a RS. –Fredddie™ 03:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

   Thanks for the review. Both questions have been answered. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

   Thank you. I will promote to GA. –Fredddie™ 11:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hell–Sunnan Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nsb.no/getfile.php/www.nsb.no/nsb.no/Bilder/Rutetabeller/26-PDF-Tronderbanen-11-12-11_09-06-12%281%29.pdf
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5zKt2zr9r?url=http://www.nsb.no/om-vaare-tog/nsb-lokaltog-type-92-article38027-4480.html to http://www.nsb.no/om-vaare-tog/nsb-lokaltog-type-92-article38027-4480.html
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/64jwK1U08?url=http://dt.no/nyheter/premiere-for-cargolink-1.3358072 to http://dt.no/article/20081217/NYHET/48239890

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)