Talk:History of Christian theology

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Christian theology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Christianity: Theology / History / India / Catholicism / Eastern O. / Oriental O. / Syriac / Jewish / Anglicanism / Lutheranism / Anabaptist / Reformed Christianity / Baptist / Arminianism / Quakers / Methodism / Holiness / Adventist / Charismatic / Evangelical / China Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christian history (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jewish Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Lutheranism (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Anabaptist work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Baptist work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Holiness movement (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Evangelical Christianity (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Christianity in China work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theology Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[1 Corinthians 15#Jesus and the believers (15:12–19)|verse 14]] The anchor (Jesus and the believers (15:12–19)) has been deleted.
[[1 Corinthians 15#Verses 3–7|1 Corinthians 15:3–5]] The anchor (Verses 3–7) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Article Improvement[edit]

As the archives demonstrate, frequent editors have pointed out the need for improvements to this article. I've already begun working on this by writing new Background, "First century" and "Second century" sections. These are my thoughts for further revision. At this time, I'm mainly focused on the early periods of Christianity.

For the lede:

There isn't a real lede (this was pointed out years ago and the situation remains the same). The article begins by abruptly talking about the Trinity.

For the section "Biblical Canon":

I'm seeing primary sources (ancient Christian writers) used as sources
Some good facts with good sources

For the section "Patristic theology":

It's entirely unsourced.
The subsection "Ante-Nicene Fathers" is a list of writers that is not very informative.

For the section "Nicene Creed":

One unsourced paragraph that is confusing. What is the "argument" that was "closed" in the first sentence?
The subsection "Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers" is unsourced, uses pov language ("heretical Byzantine emperors), and is mainly just a list of the writers of the time.
The subsection "Papacy and Primacy" has some sources but not sure about the overall accuracy.

For the section "Early heresies":

I don't like lumping the early "heresies" into one section. They should be threaded throughout the chronological narrative as they appear. Often, "orthodox" theology was developed or clarified in response to theological controversies, so both "heresy" and "orthodoxy" should be discussed alongside each other.
Section uses Scripture verses as sources
Some of these sources look like they are devotional rather than scholarly but not sure. Need a closer look.

With all this being said, my approach is to focus on developments up to 500 for now. I will probably divide things up by century, but preserve the section on the Biblical canon as I think it would be useful to keep that information altogether. As for the "Early heresies" section, I think it best to spread that information throughout the chronological narrative. Ltwin (talk) 04:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article could be promoted to B Class (and I would do that) except that it needs a more reasonable lede, if it not an ideal one. Countercheck (talk) 00:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]