Talk:History of Saint Kitts and Nevis

Caribbean High‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

[pre-Columbian tribe] named Nevis Dulcina meaning "Sweet Island"

"Dulcina" sounds rather Spanish....

Yes, it's a very odd, since there is a Latin derived female name exactly identical, also meaning sweet. And it's especially odd since the word "dulcina" had already become familiar to all layers of the medieval European society by the traveling Troubadours by the time the first English ballads were put on paper in the 1500s and would seem a natural choice for those who came across the Atlantic, rich or poor, looking for a sweeter life. Examples of such ballads are "Leanders love to loyall Hero, to the tune of Dulcina" from 1614 by William Meash and "The shepheards woing faire Dulcina" from 1615. Another thing that's odd is that the English used it for Barbuda first, before they decided Barbuda was too barren to be dulcina and sailed off for the sweeter Nevis with the name in their back pockets. The attempts to make it stick to Nevis didn't succeed either, maybe because Nevis was already named "Saint Martin" before the Nuestra Señora de las snow thing finally won the European naming competition for the island. Is Dulcina perhaps a Spanish translation then, for a word used by the pre-Columbian tribe who thought Nevis was sweet too? Who is the source for this historical info? I noticed it's on the Nevis tourism page too. Very odd indead. Hope someone on Wikipedia knows a bit about Arawakan linguistics and can verify this. I am going to put that section into "make text invisible" brackets for now < - -! Which can easily be removed later- - > once we have word from the author about it.

Sources?[edit]

No sources? Also, I'd like to know a bit more about the random raids from the French during the 1700s. This was mentioned once, and I cannot find it anywhere else online.

Objectivity[edit]

The section entitled "1883 to present" seems to be written with a particular political point of view in mind. I'm a stranger to Kittian politics but "cronies" isn't really my idea of a neutral word.

190.58.45.23 (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Armada[edit]

The article says that d'Esnambuc's fleet was destroyed by the Spanish Armada in 1625. English speakers generally think of the Great Armada when they read "Spanish Armada," but that Armada was destroyed in 1588. Perhaps it was the Armada de Barlovento that d'Esnambuc encountered? Pirate Dan (talk) 16:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Independence and significance of years in headings[edit]

It's weird to have an article on the history of an independent country that used to be a colony (or multiple colonies) that lacks any discussion of the achievement of independence. Also, there's nothing in the text to indicate the significance of the years used in the headings to break down the chronology of the nation. Largoplazo (talk) 17:14, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]