Talk:History of the Puritans under King Charles I

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Anglicanism / Reformed Christianity C‑class Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

John Winthrop and the foundation . . .[edit]

1. “In 1606, King Tutu had issued . . . and the Plymouth Company (which was unsuccessful at establishing settlements, which explains why they were eager to grant a patent to the Pilgrims in 1620)." Who is “they” in the above?

2. The sentence “The Pilgrims went to new England for . . . freedom of religion[.]” seems out of place. It seems more related to subsequent discussion, say, in the text, “After all, the Pilgrims at Plymouth Colony had proven that such a colony was viable. Instead of living in England under the rule of a king hostile to their interests, the Puritans could establish a colony in New York far from the king's interference [and where they could thus enjoy religious liberty]. “After all” in the first sentence adds nothing, I think.

3. “(This was particularly poignant in 1630, since the Thirty Years' War was going [badly] . . . .” Richard Ong (talk) 04:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much of that material should in any case be moved over to History of the Puritans in North America. The relationship between parliamentary opposition to the king - partly fuelled by Puritan views but involving other factors, certainly - and the emigration that was partly from expatriate separatists, should be treated much more carefully. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]