Talk:Indigenous People's Technology and Education Center

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indigenous People's Technology and Education Center article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missionary Organization[edit]

I believe it's fair to mention the Christian missionary nature of the organization, and a critical fact to leave out of the article. Please let me know if anyone objects to my characterization in the article. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 21:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under the additional projects section, the article currently seems to imply that the dental system is only used with the Huaorani, while I-TEC's website [1] mentions use in Romania, Chad, Patagonia, and Burma. Is this a primary source, as it is the organization's own webpage, or secondary, as they are quotes from dentists using the chairs? I'm not sure whether or not this particular aspect clears the notability criterion for inclusion, but the current article seems to be a tad misleading. Any suggestions on cleanup? Livingdust (talk) 14:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a primary source, as the material itself is coming from the organization's website. I think it's okay to add that the chair is used elsewhere and to cite the website to back it, since the existence of the program is already backed up by secondary sources. I would say something like "I-TEC states that they have used the chair in..." to indicate that it's a statement from a primary source. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 15:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See what I did with the I-See sentence, for instance. Remain neutral in tone, but indicate in the text that your information comes from a primary source. Once you have reliable secondary sources, you can be a little loser in asserting fact. This is how I interpret WP:V and WP:OR, the two primary guiding policies on sources. Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 15:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help and advice once again! Livingdust (talk) 14:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missionary Organization[edit]

Can someone find out how the marketing for the I-Fly Maverick is going? 99.236.221.124 (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indigenous People's Technology and Education Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070819091642/http://itecusa.org:80/ to http://www.itecusa.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like an advertisement[edit]

Forgive me for not knowing proper wiki-etiquette, but this reads like marketing material written by the organization.

I think it’s also worth noting that the term ‘Christ-followers’ is a pretty unusual one, and I suspect it’s a term internally favored by the organization. Perhaps it would be better to change that to Christians to make the article easier for people to understand? 74.124.137.25 (talk) 13:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]