Talk:Inharmonicity

Stretched tuning & Moving inharmonic to inharmonicity

Hello!

I'm considering moving this page to "Inharmonicity" and incorporating into its heavily edited -- yet, oddly, almost unchanging -- content the information on inharmonicity I've recently added to stretched tuning. Is anyone watching this "Inharmonic" page? If so, please read the inharmonicity part of stretched tuning and register any objections to my incorporating that somehow into "Inharmonic" and then moving the page to "Inharmonicity". Veg0matic 05:18, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

The stretched tuning article is certainly better written and generally more coherent than this one!

Bhugh (talk) 08:08, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup-rewrite

Why, what, where, and how does this article and the section "Mode-locking" need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards? Hyacinth (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Tag removed from article. Hyacinth (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

White noise graph

The article includes a graph of the spectrum of white noise. White noise has nothing to do with inharmonicity, and there's no other mention of white noise in the article. I've removed image. Omc (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

"pleasing the math"

From the article: If pleasing the ear is the goal of an aural tuning, then pleasing the math is the goal of a machine tuning.

It's nice to see a Wikipedia article where the writing has a little personality. Omc (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

List of instruments

This section doesn't say much, other than paraphrasing a bullet list at the end of this UNSW page on sound spectra. I am thinking of removing the section entirely. The issue that drew my attention to it is the assertion that brass instruments are "perfectly harmonic", whatever that is supposed to mean.

Brasses are a strange beast: being pipes closed at one end, their overtones correspond only to odd-numbered harmonics. The bell, with its flare, affects the length of tubing "seen" by waves of various lengths, so that the pitches of the odd overtone series resemble a complete set of even and odd harmonics from the second one upwards. The intonation of the set of partials for an individual horn, at a given valve combination or slide position, depends on the shape of the bell, with upper partials also being affected by the shape and dimensions of the mouthpiece: "Provided the instrument is well designed, their playing frequencies will be close to those of a complete harmonic series (provided we accept the pedal note with its nonexistent fundamental)."

That seems to say that a horn with a poorly shaped bell, or one that has become dented and distorted, may depart significantly from being "perfectly harmonic." Even brand-new horns from different manufacturers are said to have distinctive sounds. Does some part of that come from how well the partials line up with an ideal harmonic series?

Is there anyone watching who can suggest ways to clarify or expand this section? Just plain Bill (talk) 03:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inharmonicity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120209050929/http://www.acoustics.org/press/134th/galembo.htm to http://www.acoustics.org/press/134th/galembo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inharmonicity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091017233756/http://www.complexity.org.au/ci/vol01/fletch01/html/ to http://www.complexity.org.au/ci/vol01/fletch01/html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)