Talk:International public opinion on the war in Afghanistan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{Press |author = Josh Fjelstad |title = The 100 Longest Entries On Wikipedia |org = BuzzFeed |url = http://www.buzzfeed.com/fjelstud/the-100-longest-entries-on-wikipedia#.opb19rX7o |date = 2011-06-22 |accessdate = 2014-12-13}}

The horse's mouth[edit]

I have just posted a link (ABC / BBC poll from Feb 2009) re Afghani opinion of the war. Is it not a little ironic that there seem to be no / few other examples from the people of this country. Also interesting to note, as resident of the UK who consumes a fair amount of media, I have never heard such a survey reported. The fact that more Afghanis blame the Americans than the Taliban for the conflict in their country is an inconvenient truth I guess. Anyway I commend the users and contributors of this site - it is an excellent resource - any further evidence of what the Afghanis themeslves think would be welcome and appropriate.

I'm looking for more recient polls from 2010. Any Suggestions? Joe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.134.52.236 (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This entire article is a mockery to Wiki[edit]

Out of the 20 links i have investigated, none of them correctly quote the article, giving misleading quotes, stats, and at times leaving our key phrases such as 'withdrawal timelines'. For example the very first line "August 2011 United States: The large majority of Americans, 73%, want their country to withdraw troops from Afghanistan" is completely misleading and false. It it not only taken out of context, but miswords it as well. The question asked was "Do you support the Afghanistan drawdown timeline?" In referring to Obama's 2014 withdrawal suggested plan. The article reads as following: "At this point, a large majority (73%) wants the United States to reduce the number of troops in Afghanistan, but less than half (44%) want troops withdrawn completely." The context still being in referring to the 2014 time frame plan.


The rest of the entries bare striking similar circumstances and grievances. The entire article needs to be deleted and redone.


76.181.103.83 (talk) 04:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC) Jade rat[reply]

The statement you misleadingly only quoted part of is actually:
The large majority of Americans, 73%, want their country to withdraw troops from Afghanistan: The clear plurality 44% of Americans want their country to withdraw "all troops completely", and another 29% of Americans want the number of American troops in Afghanistan to be decreased.
Wanting to reduce the number of troops is wanting to withdraw troops. It is impossible to reduce the number of troops without withdrawing troops. The large majority 73% want to withdraw troops to reduce the number there, and the majority of that 73% want all the troops withdrawn. All this is presented very clearly and transparently in the statement in question. Meanwhile the 2014 timeframe you refer to is nowhere in the wording of the actual poll question, which is not the one that you misleadingly and falsely presented here, and that you demonstrably made up.
You incredibly then used this one single instance, against which you had no credible argument, to argue for the wholesale deletion of the entire article. 70.51.29.154 (talk) 03:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Mis-used tags[edit]

Removing per WP:TAGGING and WP:OVERTAGGING.

No comment left by drive-by tagger. Not actionable. Not applicable to lists. 174.91.218.102 (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POV-pushing[edit]

I've edited the 2011 section in an effort to resolve the POV pushing in this article. We do not need to be told "a majority" of 51%, or "overwhelming majority" of xx%, or "only" xx% of different groups favor or disfavor a position. Other Wikipedians are invited/urged to continue this editing process. --S. Rich (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Size split?[edit]

Split - Article is over 100 kB, and should be split starting with the years.--Jax 0677 (talk) 02:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If the article needs reducing in size, then the whole article needs reducing to a summary. If there are details then they could be put in sub articles. International public opinion on the war in Afghanistan (2007) for example probably would not be notable and so we should not really be creating that type of article. Op47 (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Link to reference no. 16 dead[edit]

The AEI website says it has been removed or changed location. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.180.232.246 (talk) 12:38, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! -- Randy2063 (talk) 14:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on International public opinion on the war in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 21 external links on International public opinion on the war in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International public opinion on the war in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]