Talk:Internet censorship in France

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Essay-like, unpublished synthesis?[edit]

At 23:36, 28 May 2011 RadioFan added three templates raising five issues to the article:

{{multiple issues|essay-like=May 2011|original research=May 2011|synthesis=May 2011}}
{{expert|date=May 2011}}
{{POV-check|date=May 2011}}

At 07:44, 29 May 2011 Skomorokh removed the expert and POV-check templates and the original research flag with the comment "these sorts of tags are unhelpful on densely-cited articles unless the tagger explains in some detail what the problems are."

That leaves essay-like and synthesis. It would be helpful if RadioFan or someone could say more specifically what parts of the article are essay-like or may contain an unpublished synthesis of published materials. Without more specifics, I am inclined to remove the multiple issues template as well. Jeff Ogden (talk) 15:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I went ahead and removed the template. We can still work to address the issues, if someone will take the time to explain what they think needs to be improved. Jeff Ogden (talk) 02:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. May I humbly suggest you add a "syria" part to this article ? Because there IS a censorhip in France around Pro-Assad stuff as far as I can tell. One can argue he's a dictator yadda yadda, true, but still, censorhsip doesn't cease to be censorship when it suits one's political needs. At one point, even the official channel sana.sy wasn't even available (back now) there are three majors ISPs in france (Orange, Sfr, Free), I don't know for Free, but I tested with Orange and SFR, both DNS tell me syriantube.net doesn't exist for instance (unknown host) while you can access it with google DNS without problem. so I suggest you check with french friends from various local ISPs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.154.56.189 (talk) 16:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



2015-12-21-----------------

Most of the listed under 'Blocked in March 2015' sites don't appear to be blocked. Why are they listed there?

Just reverted an edit that was very poorly sourced and appeared to be politically motivated. The address had another edit that was reverted on another article as well.[edit]

Title says most of what happened. 90.32.108.201 made an edit that was poorly written and poorly sourced, so I reverted everything past that point. I am new to editing and was in a rush, so I apologize in advance if anything was done incorrectly. MCmarkello (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]