Talk:Italian Benghazi

Africa: Libya Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Barnstar[edit]

I am happy to have received 2 Barnstars for writing "Italian Benghazi":

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your articles about Italian colonialism, well-written and very interisting! Your efforts are really appreciated. Cavarrone 23:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Nice job you did with Italian Benghazi. Keep up the good work. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 20:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course further improvements are welcome.--Oldsettler (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot understand why somebody keeps erasing this version awarded by 2 BARNSTARS....John T. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.167.195.116 (talk) 19:22, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on redirecting[edit]

Please note that this article was originally redirected as part of a socking WP:DENY action against banned editor Brunodam. Prima facie there is nothing wrong with the content, and it does not constitute a split (this is MUCH more expansive than the tiny section it redirects to). As long as another editor is willing to take responsibility for the content and reinstitute it under their agency, that is entirely fine and proper, and not in itself a reason for reverting to redirect. I'd suggest assessing the content and then going for a merge/deletion/whatever, if indicated; but not compulsive returning to redirect. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]