Talk:Jermaine (Adventure Time)

Jermaine (Adventure Time) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 25, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Cartoon Network Low‑importance

	Cartoon Network portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Jermaine (Adventure Time) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 June 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that comic book artist Brandon Graham wrote "Jermaine", his first episode for Adventure Time?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jermaine (Adventure Time).

Wikipedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jermaine (Adventure Time)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 00:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 00:54, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review pending[edit]

Thank you very much for your efforts to contribute to Quality improvement on Wikipedia, it's really most appreciated !!!
NOTE: Please respond, below entire review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks!
Suggestion: This suggestion is optional only, but I ask you to please at least read over the Good Article review instructions, and consider reviewing two to three (2-3) GA candidates from good articles nominations, for each one (1) that you nominate. Again, this is optional and a suggestion only, but please do familiarize yourself at least with how to review, and then think about it. This is a way to help out the Wikipedia community by reducing our GA Review WP:BACKLOGS, and a form of paying it forward. Thank you !

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No issues with prose, concise writing style, good grammar, does indeed respect copyright laws, and Copyvio Detector linked to from GA Toolbox shows no significant issues -- EXCELLENT JOB HERE, THIS IS WHAT WE LIKE TO SEE, NICE WORK !
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	WP:LEAD sect is okay for now, but should be expanded after addition of further secondary sources.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Good layout, good structural organization, good use of citations, throughout.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Duly cited throughout to WP:RS sources. I checked with Checklinks tool and no problems here.
	2c. it contains no original research.	At present, it appears about 30 percent of the sources cited are primary sources. Need to add good amount more secondary source coverage to balance this out a bit more.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Please add some Background info, as was already skillfully done at Bad Timing (Adventure Time). Please expand Reception info with additional secondary sources.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Could even go into a bit more detail, specifically on Reception info.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Unclear. Article does not present enough secondary source coverage of Reception info to merit comprehensive analysis on NPOV.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Upon inspection of article edit history and article talk page and article talk page history, article is stable going back over four (4) months.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Good fair use rationale on image page.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Image is relevant to the topic, as argued in fair use rationale at the image page.
	7. Overall assessment.	GA on Hold for Seven Days. — Cirt (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Please respond, below entire review, and not interspersed throughout, thanks! — Cirt (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@23W:Any updates on this one ? — Cirt (talk) 06:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, not GA at this time[edit]

Unfortunately, closing this one as not GA at this time.

I see GA Nominator has not been back to revisit, and also hasn't been on Wikipedia in one week.

Hopefully above GA Review will help future editors improve the page quality.

And if GA Nominator returns and sees this, please feel free to address above, and then let me know.

Good luck,

— Cirt (talk) 03:20, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]