Talk:Jodie Fisher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

Jodie Fisher has been on numerous mainstream television programs, and has been written about by sources including the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, NY Daily News and The Huffington Post. I don't think there's any question about her notability vis-a-vis being on Wikipedia, and, as such, I've removed the warning regarding notability from the page. Sprhodes (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about her time as a porn star?[edit]

Numerous reports of her involvement with and false accusations against Mark Hurd portray her as a "FORMER PORN STAR".

Here's one: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/30/business/note-that-led-to-downfall-of-hewlett-chief-surfaces.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.168.139 (talk) 01:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just because someone calls me a former porn star does not make it true. It is an absolute smear of my name and FALSE. I did several R rated films. I have never been in an X rated film, have never done porn. Loveinfo123 (talk) 22:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That article was written by someone who doesn't understand the Erotic Thriller genre. Jodie Fisher did a few films in the Erotic Thriller genre (she's even interviewd in a recent documentary about erotic thrillers) but Erotic thrillers are not the same as pornography. You wouldn't call Sharon Stone a pornstar just because she was nude in a few scenes of Basic Instinct. Jaydoggmarco (talk) 02:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jodie Fisher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loveinfo123[edit]

To editor Loveinfo123: Since you have a conflict of interest regarding this subject, you should only be asking for edits here not actually editing the article. You do not own this page and ought not be trying to control what this article says. I ask you to please discuss you disagreements before you are blocked from editing, as you are a single-purpose editor and not here to build an encyclopedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]