Talk:John Scott (botanist)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about a botanist or someone who contributed to the field of botany

This article seems too short and a very minor character. I do not understand why it justifies an article. It is at best a stub

Further it is simply regurgitating in formation on the Darwin Project website

Jono2013 (talk) 01:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article consists of six sentences at this time, and offers useful information about a botanist who assisted Darwin. It is a useful, brief biography. Prospects for expanding the article are very good. A search for sources is complicated by the fact that the name is very common. It is just a matter of separating the wheat from the chaff. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]