Talk:Joseph John Gurney

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edits March 2006[edit]

_ _ I replaced the phrase

He was not a paid clergyman, as the Quakers did not have such people, but ...

by lengthening the sentence into

(This meant he was noted as a person gifted by God for preaching and teaching, but Quakers then neither explicitly designated individuals to take substantial roles in their worship, nor financially supported its ministers unless their travels in that role would otherwise have been impractical.)

Reading between the lines, i'd guess that Gurney supported his ministries of social activism and preaching with family money, tho sufficiently charismatic people without independent incomes would likely have been "released" from the constraints of their normal livelihoods to the extent that specific plans were inconsistent, by having expenses paid until they returned to their work. Quakers of the time would have insisted that the distinction between this and payment for preaching is clear-cut, and that the spontaneity and near-universality of ministry was a clear-cut matter, but there is some PoV involved to those assertions, and the version i replaced muddies the facts: e.g. it invites the inferences that

  • the only difference was pay, and that there were a distinct "clergy" who, for free, were writing weekly sermons and administering the sacraments, and
  • that the situation was the same at all times (except that Quakerism died out).

_ _ I dunno whether our other articles on Quakers cover this stuff adequately; the red lk for Quaker minister certainly raises the possibility that we don't.
--Jerzyt 03:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overend, Gurney & Co‎[edit]

Is there any relationship between Gurneys Bank and Overend, Gurney & Co‎? -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph John Gurney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]