Talk:Katryna Gaither

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contesting speedy deletion[edit]

As the creater of this article, I believe that it is important enough to be included. I can't believe that being the second best scorer in Notre Dame history isn't notable. The length may not be good, but the importance is ok. Please keep this article, as I believe this is notable.--Summonmaster13 03:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Failure to meet notability standards[edit]

Notability standards are contained in WP:BIO. The athletes sections are presently being discussed but competing for a University is so low down the pecking order that it is off the radar. BlueValour 06:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with you. Very few athletes compete for universities, and she was one of the best. To be second on the all time scoring list imo says something. I don't see why this article isn't notable. --Summonmaster13 18:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katryna Gaither. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]