Talk:Lesbian vampire

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hammer / Trevelyan[edit]

"Partially due to censorship restraints from the BBFC, Hammer's trilogy actually had less lesbian elements as it proceeded." I do not dispute the above notation about censorship, but what is the source? Zahir13 20:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A large format book about Hammer Horror from my local library, which I cannot recall the name of, and which is currently not in my possession. I'll try and get hold of it when the library opens after Christmas holidays and give you the ref. From what I recall the chief UK censor of the time, one Mr Trevelyan, was somewhat knocked sidewise by the realization, after watching 'The Vampire Lovers' that there was such a thing as 'lesbianism': a thing deemed by Queen Victoria not to exist. Therefore, in the spirit which made Britain great, Mr Trevelyan monitored the sequel 'Lust for a Vampire', whilst it was in production to make sure that any girl-girl action was kept to a minimum. Apparantly a proposed scene in which Carmilla gets her teeth into a schoolgirl was cut, before it was even shot. Therefore what should have been an orgy of torrid lesbianism featuring a lesbian vampire in a girl's school strangely mutated into the sad effort which is the present film. There is also an issue of the periodical 'Little Shop of Horrors' devoted to the Karnstein Trilogy which might have more info on this....and which indeed might even be in my house somewhere....Colin4C 21:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably that would be John Trevelyan? Zahir13 16:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I was thinking of putting more info in his article as well. I saw a copy of a book by said worthy called 'What the Censor Saw' in my local second hand book shop, which I might buy when my next pay check comes through. I think the trouble with Trevelyan was that he was caught between the advocates of permissiveness on one side and old prudish battle-axes like Mary Whitehouse on the other, and was criticised by both sides. His book is quite amusing, when you compare the philosophical musings in the text on the ethics of censorship with the explicit scenes of nudity, sex and horror in the illustrations. Colin4C 17:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add that in 1971 (when Lust for a Vampire was released) Britain was witnessing the bizarre Schoolkids OZ obcenity trial in which the defendents were sentenced to prison 'with hard labour' for publishing some mildly pornographic stuff in their magazine. We are a funny lot here in the UK...even without lesbian vampires...Colin4C 17:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lust of dracula dvd cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Lust of dracula dvd cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LUST 007.jpg[edit]

The image Image:LUST 007.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:Vampire lovers cap.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comics[edit]

This section is unclear:

In comics, the greatest lesbian vampire was Purgatori, a former slavegirl from Egypt whose
bloodline included the fallen angels.

Which comic is being discussed? What is the context? How valid is the information, really? Is it valid, but in need of rewriting, or just blatant nonsense? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 01:17, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since this was a single edit from an anonymous IP, I am skeptical to the addition. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Early cinema[edit]

Dracula's Daughter (1936) gave the first hints of lesbian attraction in a vampire film...

Although this claim is referenced, I can't believe that the theme was unexplored before 1936. Try The Celluloid Closet for the veiled gay signals used in the silent films. Valetude (talk) 22:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do all sapphic vampires apply for the list?[edit]

If all sapphic vampires in films and television programs apply for the list, Marceline the Vampire Queen from Adventure Time is missing. She offically gets together with Princess Bubblegum. For reference see Marceline the Vampire Queen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrien Jael (talk • contribs) 00:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]