Talk:Limitarianism (ethical)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Limitarianism (ethical) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Should be several articles[edit]

Maybe. --83.118.219.9 (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 April 2024[edit]

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– ~~(The last set of moves is not a requested move but a histmerge, considering one was copied-pasted to the other.)~~ I'm seeking consensus on whether the (ethical) article is a broad concept article that should occupy the base page name; it was moved in 2017. If consensus is that (ethical) is not a broad concept article (or the primary topic) [or there is no consensus], I plan to open further discussions to see if a split (#Should be several articles above) is in order. Thanks in advanced! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 17:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've performed the history merge. No opinion on which is primary. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! My opinion—that the current organization of (ethical) is not ideal—is neither concrete nor strong. Hence the RM. The WikiNav data for February 2024 shows that all 22 outgoing clicks from the base page name went to (ethical). Anecdotally, my only other exposure to limitarianism so far is a recent news headline about Robeyns (economic limitarianism). I just don't know if that qualifies as recentism; the top DuckDuckGo results show some scholarly papers from 2022—mainstream media coverage seems to begin mostly early 2024, perhaps because Robeyns has turned the earlier paper into a book? tl;dr Unsure of the best way to proceed, I ask for a second opinion. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiNav data is similar for March 2024: all 22 outgoing links from Limitarianism go to (ethical). If anything, the parenthetical dab should be a noun—Limitarianism (ethics) or Limitarianism (philosophy), perhaps? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Philosophy has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]