Talk:List of medieval land terms

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Glossaries (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This article/glossary has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

order of list entries[edit]

Might it be appropriate to order the list entries according to their size or hierarchical relationship among each other? Maybe something like the largest subdivisions could be listed first followed by its subdivisions in turn, or the opposite (smalled first followed the the larger entities)? The entries that are similar or nearly equivalent can be grouped together within the over-all hierarchy. Might this be a reasonable arrangement? -RobertBlacknut 23:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.. alphabetical if nearly equivalent. Ohwell32 04:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References, please[edit]

This article presents historical information sans references. This is contrary to current wikipedia standards. For those of us who wish to consult the original sources, please add same. Dlw20070716 (talk) 00:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of medieval land terms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050404115544/http://the-orb.net/encyclop/culture/towns/glossary.html to http://the-orb.net/encyclop/culture/towns/glossary.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

British or general list?[edit]

The article seems to restrict itself to land ownership in Great Britain. Should the title be changed to match the scope, or the article expanded to cover European feudalism in general? A few of these terms have counterparts in continental Europe, and it seems other applicable terms may have been left out because they weren't particular to Britain. Daß Wölf 22:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]