This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This listing, which does not have references, contains non-notable red-links. Culling the list to notable peaks will make the listing more concise. – S. Rich (talk) 02:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable peaks can (and perhaps should) be included as long as they have references. Notability is only required for something to have its own article. However, many peaks have been added within the last year or two that are not mentioned in any of the listed refs. These are the ones that should be removed, unless a reliable source can be found. --Lasunncty (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was incorrect in one sense, the listing does have a listing of external links. The real problem is the redlinking. The WP guideline WP:RED says "Add red links to articles to indicate that a page will be created soon or that an article should be created for the topic because the subject is notable and verifiable." None of the redlinks here is going to get an article simply because we have sources that note the elevations and locations. – S. Rich (talk) 14:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lasunncty: After sitting and cogitating on my mountain top hermit's perch I think I will revert my deletion of the redlinked summations. And then I'll de-link them. While our list article may duplicate or overlap the EL lists, interested WP editors can look at our list and see what notable peaks have (or do not have) articles. – S. Rich (talk) 03:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
