Talk:Louis Zhang Jiashu

Louis Zhang Jiashu has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 15, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Catholicism / China Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Christianity in China work group.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Louis Zhang Jiashu appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Louis Zhang Jiashu, a Catholic bishop of Shanghai who studied at Canterbury in 1911, received the archbishop of Canterbury, Michael Ramsey, in Shanghai in 1983?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Louis Zhang Jiashu.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 02:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Louis Zhang Jiashu, Catholic bishop of Shanghai who studied at Canterbury in 1911, received the archbishop of Canterbury, Michael Ramsey, in Shanghai in 1983? Source: Zhang studied at Canterbury was mentioned in Fu, Keyong (1996). 爱国爱教的楷模——张家树主教 [An Example for his Love of the Country and the Religion: Bishop Zhang Jiashu] (PDF). 中国宗教 [Religions In China] (01). ISSN 1006-7558. and Zhang, Duomo (2002). 我的伯父张家树主教 [My Uncle, Bishop Zhang Jiashu]. 世界宗教文化 [World Religions and Cultures] (03).. Zhang meeting Ramsey can be found in p. 408, Editorial Committee (2001). 上海宗教志 [History of Religion in Shanghai]. Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press. ISBN 9787806188255.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Artificial planet
- Comment: The fun part is that they visited each other's jurisdiction despite being of different churches. I think another good hook could cover the fact that Zhang was elected bishop by the party-backed CPA, but was soon disposed during the party-made Cultural Revolution. Feel free to throw in other hooks.

Created by TheLonelyPather (talk). Self-nominated at 07:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Louis Zhang Jiashu; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Substantial interesting article on fine sources, Chinese sources accepted AGF. The hook is fine. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Gerda! ~~Now I just need to supply you with a QPQ...~~ QPQ done! Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Passed. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 23:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Louis Zhang Jiashu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TheLonelyPather (talk · contribs) 08:52, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sawyer-mcdonell (talk · contribs) 07:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i aim to get through this in the next week or so ... sawyer * he/they * talk 07:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Take your time! Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 07:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

The Atlantic article (Minter 2007) listed in the magazines section of the bibliography is unused - it has a harverror. There are also quite a lot of optimistic redlinks, which I'm absolutely not opposed to, but many of them are not introduced in the prose (such as Angelo Lazzarotto) and that would be good to clarify. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the Atlantic article from the bibliography.
Removed the red link over Angelo Lazzarotto, and clarified it. Now the general principle is to use red links only when there is another article in a different language.
Substituted "lang-zh" templates with "zhi" templates. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 20:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything out there about his legacy? He died over 35 years ago; some hindsight about his impact on the Chinese Catholic Church would really round out the article for criteria 3a. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find much. I will search a bit more later. I think his impact on the Chinese Catholic Church is his role in the founding of the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CCPA) and that he was the "bishop of Shanghai" during a large portion of the 20th century. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your intuition–I found quite a bit. I will expand his late years (post 1980) accordingly this week. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
awesome! i'll work on getting through the rest of the criteria this weekend :) ... sawyer * he/they * talk 01:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sawyer-mcdonell I supplied some more information. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 10:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing - all the sources seem reliable & perfectly fine; glad to see a lot of academic sourcing here. I can't read the Chinese sources, but I spot-checked the citations to the main English-language sources (Mariani 2011 & 2016, Lazzarotto 2017) and everything looks good to me. I think the legacy aspect has been addressed, and I don't have any further concerns regarding the GA criteria. Excellent work! ... sawyer * he/they * talk 23:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.