Talk:Made You Look (Meghan Trainor song)/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

(
)

Created by MaranoFan (talk). Self-nominated at 08:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @MaranoFan: Very interesting hook! Article looks fine to me, although I was initially put off by the high percentage that the plagiarism detector gave me. However, it appears that the most similar websites were Wikipedia mirror pages. Approving. Unlimitedlead (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Made You Look (Meghan Trainor song)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Made You Look (Meghan Trainor song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AUT":

  • From Meghan Trainor: "Lips Are Movin (2014)". 7digital (in German). Archived from the original on December 18, 2014. Retrieved December 18, 2014.
  • From Lips Are Movin: "Lips Are Movin (2014)". 7digital (AT) (in German). Archived from the original on December 18, 2014. Retrieved December 18, 2014.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

Passed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Made You Look (Meghan Trainor song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 11:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Hopefully I can complete this today! --K. Peake 11:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

  • Infobox looks good!
  • "Trainor wrote the song with" → "Trainor co-wrote the song with"
  • "released it as" → "released the song as"
  • "the song was inspired by Trainor's insecurities about body image and" → "it was inspired by Trainor's insecurities about body image, and"
  • Pipe music critics to Music journalism
  • "with positive commentary directed towards its" → "who directed positive commentary towards the"
  • "production but some criticism of" → "production, but criticized"
  • Remove the release year of "Me Too"
  • Mention the month the video premiered
  • "Trainor performed it on" → "Trainor performed the song on" and mention that these were in 2022

Background and release

  • Img looks good!
  • "top-10 singles on the" → "top-10 singles on the US"
  • Remove the comma after third album
  • "attempt to "adapt to" → "attempt of "adapting to" per the source
  • "after its preceding singles" → "after the preceding singles"
  • "she announced her" → "Trainor announced her"
  • "along with her pregnancy's influence on it." → "along with the influence of her pregnancy."
  • "wrote "Made You Look" with" → "wrote "Made You Look" alongside"
  • "was inspired by her insecurities" → "was inspired by the singer's insecurities"
  • "Trainor pitched the lyric" → "Trainor pitched the lines"
  • Introduce her husband in prose at this point rather than later on
  • "while writing it." → "while writing the track."
  • "its a cappella version featuring" → "its a cappella version, featuring"
  • "was released with an accompanying" → "was released alongside a"
  • "following which two million" → "following which around two million" per the source

Composition

  • Retitle to Composition and lyrics
  • Audio sample looks good!
  • Pipe percussion to Percussion instrument
  • Wikilink baritone saxophone
  • Wikilink trombone
  • "Jeremie Inhaber mixed it," → "Jeremie Inhaber mixed the song,"
  • Pipe Sterling Sound to Sterling Sound Studios
  • ""Made You Look" is a" → "Musically, "Made You Look" is a"
  • "instrumentation to achieve this sound." → "instrumentation to achieve the style." per the source
  • "features the bass and brass instruments which" → "features bass and brass instruments, which"

Critical reception

  • "received mixed reviews from" → "was met with mixed reviews from"
  • "previous work and praising its" → "previous work, and praising the"
  • "struck the perfect balance between nostalgia for early Trainor music as well as" → "achieved a correct balance between nostalgia for early Trainor music and"
  • "would not listen to it again," → "would not listen to the song again,"
  • Remove "with it" from the end of the sentence because this is clear from you having used "it" enough times
  • Per Plugged In being a fundamentalist source, is it really reliable?

Commercial performance

  • "issued for November 5, 2022." → "issued dated November 5, 2022."
  • "on the chart, Trainor's first" → "on the chart, becoming Trainor's first" but this sentence is confusing; you should mention the Streaming Songs position for consistency and also add the source's stats
  • Decapitalise silver
  • Add BPI in brackets and mention it was in the United Kingdom, plus how many copies were sold
  • The certification source link does not offer a sales count. It might constitute original research/synthesis to speculate
  • Decapitalise gold and add RMNZ in brackets, mentioning the number of copies
  • Same as above
  • "where it charted at number six." → "charting at number six."

Music video

  • Retitle to Music video and promotion
  • "always, but I" → "always ... but I" per the context
  • "and Trainor's husband, Daryl Sabara, as" → "and Sabara as"

Live performances

  • Make this the second para of the above section

Credits and personnel

  • Good

Charts

  • Use col to separate the monthly and year-end ones from the weekly charts

Certifications

  • Good

Release history

  • None of these should be sortable
  • The sources do not back up a various release

References

  • Copyvio score looks great at 23.1%!!!!
  • Is Pop Culture really reliable for ref 4? If kept, change to PopCulture.
  • Interview directly with Trainor which should be admissible per WP:ABOUTSELF
  • Again, is ref 17 acceptable as a Christian fundamentalist source?
  • They have an extensive team and an editor according to their about page, and as a music review is not a political topic I guess that might be excusable. I think removing all usages of this source will be detrimental to readers' understanding of the article
  • Remove ABC News from ref 23, citing Associated Press as publisher instead
  • Cite Today as work/website instead on ref 46
  • Cite TopHit as publisher instead on ref 55
  • ifpi.gr → IFPI Greece on ref 62 with the wikilink, citing as publisher instead
  • Remove The Official South African Charts from ref 78
  • Cite Circle Chart as publisher instead on refs 79 and 87

Final comments and verdict

  •  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went faster than I thought somewhat! --K. Peake 12:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for taking care of this review, K. Peake. As always, your speed is very impressive! I've addressed the review comments :)--NØ 14:39, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
  • MaranoFan That is reassuring, however you need to add the units sold for the certifications since it's not original research when reaching certifications requires a certain amount of units. --K. Peake 14:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The BPI cert page states the song is certified Silver and the RMNZ page states it is Gold, both without providing any sales counts. It would be synthesis to use another link to prove the certification thresholds. I think this could be discussed at one of the Music wikiprojects in the future to determine what the consensus is but I'm going to err on the side of caution until then. Regards.--NØ 15:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
K. Peake, to word it a different way, it is fine to state in the certification table that so-and-so many copies is the threshold needed to achieve said certification, but making the claim "Made You Look sold X many copies" in the prose does not pass verification from the cert ref as this is not directly stated in any source. Are you going to hold up promotion over this? That would be extremely weird to me and you haven't asked for this particular change on any prior GAN.--NØ 03:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Pass now, this issue will not get in the way of that! --K. Peake 09:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kim Petras

The article should probably have a bit of info about the Kim Petras version. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done--NØ 08:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Made_You_Look_(Meghan_Trainor_song)/Archive_1&oldid=1175125019"