Talk:Marc Pugh/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are a number of issues that need to be addressed.

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

The prose is average, maybe a 6/10.

The lead is too short and does not adequately sum up the article.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

This article is in urgent need of updating to cover the most recent seasons and this Welsh issue.

His early life and personal life are ignored by the article and must be included.

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN again. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

I was asked to look at the article again, and the prose, lead and updating has all been satifactoarily improved, good job. Although this will almost certainly pass now, I would like to see some information about his life outside football: is he married, has he been in the news for any reason and any other information which may be relevant (See Brian Urlacher for a good example of how such a section may look, although I don't expect one for this article to be as long). Well done on the hard work.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Actually, on second thoughts, although what I said above is valid and should be explored, I am going to pass this now. Well done.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:59, 18 December 2008 (UTC)