Talk:Mattias Öhlund/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 21:00, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on October 24, 2009. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

The lead should cover the entire article not just key highlights.
Watch double linking of terms. As I can see Piteå HC and Elitserien are linked twice early on. Only link to an article twice if the occurances are far apart.
After another look Babe Pratt Trophy, Vancouver Canucks and Sweden seem to be linked a few times as well.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

First article I've reviewed with ALT text.

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

I feel bad putting this on hold, but with those minor (but necessary) changes, I'll be happy to pass the article.--Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 21:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.

Removed the second links, and added a mention about how injury-prone Öhlund has been throughout his NHL career. There really isn't much more information that would be appropriate for the lead. Kaiser matias (talk) 22:45, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now going to pass the article, since while I'd like to see the lead expanded a bit more, it really isn't that big of an issue.--Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]