Talk:Mihail Sadoveanu/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aircorn (talk · contribs) 01:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC) Will review this over the next few days. AIRcorn (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
A few initial points. This article is huge. I measure over 100kb of pose. Wikipedia:Article size recommends splitting or dividing articles above 100kb. It could also impact on the focus criteria (plus it makes reviewing a huge task). Also the nominator has made no edits to this article.[1] Has the main contributor been notified of this? This could be problematic as I have no idea if the nominator can respond to any potential concerns I might have. I am also weary of reviewing an article of thus size if it is just a drive-by-nom as it could waste a lot of my time if no one responds or can't respond.
- FWIW, Wizardman and I both raised the length issue on the talk page two months ago without response from anyone working on the article. I haven't read the whole thing, but I also have trouble imagining that an article of this length can meet the focus criterion. -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
- Months ago, the major contributor allowed me to nominate any of their articles for GA. I see no issue with a long article. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately myself and two other experienced reviewers do. I am not seeing any justification for this article being this long. I think it would require quite some time and collaboration between yourself and the main contributor to trim it back to a manageable size. That is if you wish to. Not having the green spot does not mean the article is bad, just that some editors don't think it meets the WP:GACR. In this case I think it fails the focus criteria, particularly the "see summary style" link there. You are welcome to take this to reassessment if you feel this failing is unfair. AIRcorn (talk) 06:25, 6 March 2013 (UTC)