Talk:Napsbury Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal[edit]

The pages Napsbury Park & Napsbury are very similar, with a large amount of content copied between the two. Hence I think the articles should be merged.

In my opinion, the more common local name for the area is "Napsbury Park" - therefore I propose Napsbury should be merged into Napsbury Park.

Support MikeHobday (talk) 17:45, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Either there should be two articles, "Napsbury Hospital" and "Napsbury Park" or all material should be merged into this article. I personally like the idea of creating a Napsbury Hospital article and putting most of the hospital info there. These really seem to be two distinct subjects.Bill Pollard (talk) 20:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We agree. I represent the Napsbury Park Residents Association and Napsbury Park and Napsbury are both the same place. The surviving place should be Napsbury Park. There should be a separate, but linked page, for the old Napsbury Hospital. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.188.254.188 (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC)   checkY Merger complete. --DarkCrowCaw 18:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Napsbury Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]