Talk:National Shrine of St. Elizabeth Ann Seton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rated as C class[edit]

I have rated this article as C class. In my opinion, to reach B class, the article requires a significant expansion such that it is "mostly complete" and "readers are not left wanting". Details of the commissioning, design, cost, construction etc of the shrine may be areas in which the article can be expanded. The article will also require at least one image to illustrate it. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not New York[edit]

Thanks for catching my erroneous picture; I was following a link from the New York article without checking. So, now James Watson House has also been corrected. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, as soon as I saw it the skyscrapers in the background threw up a major red flag. If you have ever been to the Shrine it is in the middle of a very rural area. Marauder40 (talk) 13:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on National Shrine of St. Elizabeth Ann Seton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]