Talk:New Oxford American Dictionary

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Language Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Reference works (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

Untitled[edit]

Perhaps this can get a one sentence mention somewhere on the article? [1]?Calaka (talk) 10:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford American Dictionary[edit]

Oxford American Dictionary redirects to this article but it's not clear what the relationship is between that dictionary and the New Oxford American Dictionary. I have a copy. On the title page, it lists

Eugene Ehrlich
Stuart Berg Flexner Gorton Carruth
Joyce M. Hawkins

New York Oxford
Oxford University Press
1980

The copyright page has

Copyright © 1980 by Oxford University Press, Inc.
Based on The Oxford Paperback Dictionary
© 1979 Oxford University Press

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Oxford American Dictionary
1. English language—dictionaries
2. English language in the United States.
PE2835.09 423 80-16510 ISBN 0-19-502795-7

Printed in the United States of America

The preface does not add anything useful. Oddly, while it's dated June 1980 implying it's a preface credited for this edition it does not mention that this work is based on The Oxford Paperback Dictionary. It starts out with "This new member of the Oxford family of dictionaries ..." It's signed with the initials of the people on the title page who I assume were the editors.

The Library of Congress has a record at http://lccn.loc.gov/80016510

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marc Kupper (talk • contribs) 23 August 2011‎

Pronunciation[edit]

The article says, "NOAD includes a diacritical respelling scheme to convey pronunciations, in addition to the Gimson phonemic IPA system that is used in NODE." In addition? Shouldn't this be "as opposed to"? The preview I see at Amazon.com (2nd ed.) seems to only show the diacritical system. - dcljr (talk) 04:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about the first two editions, but the third edition states on page xxv that it uses "a simple respelling system." It does not use any IPA symbols. Wahrmund (talk) 00:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm changing the article. - dcljr (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Oxford American Dictionary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nbierma.com/language/column/file/050921.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]